53 pages 1 hour read

The Afghanistan Papers: A Secret History of the War

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2021

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 19-21Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 19 Summary: “Trump’s Turn”

In August 2017, Donald Trump seemed more willing than his predecessors to acknowledge public fatigue with the war in Afghanistan and was more forthright in calling out Pakistan’s role in sheltering the Taliban while nonetheless promising to win the war. Despite having called an end to the war as a presidential candidate, Trump decided that lack of progress was due mainly to incompetence and lack of will among the generals, whom he called “a bunch of dopes and babies” (243). The generals accordingly crafted their pitch for more time, resources, and troops as an alternative approach to Obama and his timetable. The Trump administration would also bury the war in layers of secrecy so that the public would not know what was going on and therefore not hold the administration accountable for any setbacks. As long as the generals gave Trump credit for any successes, he would keep the war going regardless of actual conditions on the ground. Airstrikes doubled in 2017 from the previous year, which also doubled the number of average civilian casualties (246), but Trump was undeterred by the publicity that came from dropping large bombs on seemingly hapless targets.

In 2017, the US also started concealing the number of casualties suffered by Afghan security forces and how much territory the government controlled relative to the Taliban. When the new commanding general, Scott Miller, testified to the Senate that progress was being made, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren confronted him with the 17 years of similar predictions that had failed to come true. In his stammering answer, Miller acknowledged that people the age of his own son (a newly minted lieutenant) would one day serve in the war he had joined in its opening days. During Miller’s first visit to Afghanistan upon taking command, he barely escaped assassination in an attack that killed the provincial police commander and wounded the governor. Just as before, officials insisted that the attack only coincidentally endangered the general and that the Taliban could not have had the intelligence or capability to attack him directly.

Chapter 20 Summary: “The Narco-State”

In November 2017, US forces launched a massive airstrike on opium-processing plants, calling it a major blow against the Taliban’s finances. Later reports concluded that the raids targeted either empty warehouses or smalltime production facilities, doing nothing to dent the 400% rise in opium production since 2009 (254). The continuation of the war favored the growth of opium, which was easier to cultivate, store, and ship than other crops (which were also far less profitable). Richard Holbrooke, an experienced diplomat who took a leading role in Obama’s Afghanistan policy until his untimely death in 2010, tried to incentivize farmers to switch crops. However, “opium served as the cornerstone of the economy in many rural areas” (258), and the US had neither the resources nor the knowledge to overcome such deeply embedded features of Afghan society.

Over 15 years, the US spent $4.5 billion on drug interdiction in Afghanistan (259), but at the peak of its effectiveness, it could capture only 2% of production. It likewise set up a judiciary that was then thoroughly penetrated by the drug trade. Attempts to prosecute wrongdoing ran into interference from either the Afghan government seeking to protect an ally or the CIA or other government agency likewise protecting a valued asset. Obama’s efforts to reduce US forces made it even more difficult to restrict the drug trade, and even faster turnover made it nearly impossible to pursue any one strategy for a considerable length of time. By 2016, staffers came in proposing ideas so old that they “didn’t realize those tactics had been tried before, to no avail” (262). 

Chapter 21 Summary: “Talking to the Taliban”

In the early months of 2019, a Taliban delegation had set up shop in Doha, Qatar. The US was supposed to be serving as a mediator for talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government after years of either refusing any outreach or bungling opportunities to start talks. There had been efforts to distinguish “irreconcilable from reconcilable” Taliban (266), with plans to rehabilitate the latter and destroy the former. But the Taliban’s roots were too deep in Afghan society for such an individualized approach. Even so, White House officials were reluctant to give credibility to the organization that had sheltered bin Laden and risked progress on women’s rights.

The US insisted that any peace talks would be among the Afghans themselves, but the Karzai government was loath to treat the Taliban as an equal, and the Taliban dismissed the government as an American puppet. Talks got underway after a prisoner exchange in which the US freed five high-level Taliban detainees from Guantanamo Bay in exchange for Bowe Bergdahl, a sergeant who inexplicably walked off his post and spent five years as a prisoner. The swap helped establish communication, and some of those released from Guantanamo ended up being the main interlocutors. However, Obama received such fierce criticism for the exchange that diplomacy would go no further under his own presidency.

In 2018, the Trump administration authorized direct talks with the Taliban in Doha, ultimately agreeing for a withdrawal of all US forces by May 2021 and the release of 5,000 Taliban prisoners in exchange for a promise to negotiate with the Afghan government and provide “assurances that Afghanistan would not be used to launch attacks on the United States” (273). Trump passed the war on to Joe Biden, who had opposed counterinsurgency efforts when he was Obama’s vice president. Biden tried to jumpstart negotiations between the Taliban and the Afghan government, but when those stalled, he still secured a plan to withdraw US forces by September 11, 2021, the 20th anniversary of the attacks.

Chapters 19-21 Analysis

The Afghanistan Papers was published in anticipation of the Biden administration’s expected withdrawal from Afghanistan but before it actually happened. As Whitlock notes, the administration requested a roughly four-month delay from the timeframe requested by the Trump administration, settling on the symbolically crucial date of September 11, 2021. The Taliban agreed to this date, and US forces actually completed the withdrawal ahead of schedule, with the last US forces departing by August 30.

Whitlock hints that Biden, long a skeptic of the war effort, injected a long-overdue dose of realism after decades of deception and wishful thinking. He writes,

Unlike his predecessors, Biden gave a sobering assessment of two decades of warfare. He did not try to frame the outcome as a victory. Instead, he said the United States had achieved its original objective long ago by destroying al-Qaeda’s stronghold in Afghanistan. He suggested that US troops should have left after they killed Osama bin Laden. ‘That was ten years ago. Think about that,’ he said (275).

By the standards of his predecessors, this was remarkably clear-eyed and sober. Much of the outrage that followed the withdrawal was surely due to a public that had heard nothing but carefree optimism for the better part of 20 years, while the majority of citizens were free to ignore the war entirely. Hence, the book fashions Biden and his administration as more open to the concrete realities about Afghanistan than his predecessors.

Partisanship also played a role, and such criticism would surely have followed a withdrawal under a second Trump administration. However, the Biden administration displayed a Willful Blindness all its own. As Whitlock describes, “His administration prodded the Taliban and the Afghan government to accelerate their stalled negotiations and to hold a summit with regional powers. But the efforts held little promise and gained no traction” (274). Biden had not received any evidence that the Afghan government was in any position to negotiate, having lost territory at a steady clip since at least the Trump administration. He was simply trying to find his way out of a difficult situation, and the illusion that a solution was in the offing required a delay in the actual process of withdrawing US forces, which would tell the Taliban in no uncertain terms that the Afghan government’s days were numbered. But by waiting, the evacuation was rushed and ultimately sent waves of panic throughout the population, especially those who had in some manner aided the American effort and were thus liable to Taliban retaliation.

Despite giving Biden some credit for his willingness to acknowledge the problems the US had with Afghanistan, Whitlock paints Biden and his administration as complicit in mismanagement. As people struggled to get onto the last flights leaving Afghanistan, the world saw horrifying images of people clinging to planes and falling to their death, and then suicide bombers from ISIS targeted the crowds, killing nearly 200 (including 13 US soldiers). After the withdrawal, the Afghan government fell apart within days, leading Biden to blame them and their cowardice for returning the country to Taliban rule. This may have been true in part, but ultimately Biden proved no more willing than his predecessors to reckon with the US’s role in propping up a corrupt government and then gradually undermining it to the point where US support was its main lease on life.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 53 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 9,150+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools